[ an / co / v / t ] [ e / r / sp ] [ p / s ] [ All / Recent / RSS ] [ FAQ / IRC / Rules / Legal / News ] [ Twitter ] [ Mod ]

/t/ - Technology

Gadzooks, Moosic, Compooters, and Cyberpunk
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1474585351264.png (1.2 MB, 1920x1080, screeeen.png)

 No.1086[View All]

post your desktop right now no cheating
192 posts and 124 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.1648

>>1647
I will never understand how people can use xfce, gnome is just so much better.

I'm sure I'll have to make the switch to i3 at some point though, maybe sooner rather than later as I need to do a reinstall.

 No.1649

>>1648
>I will never understand how people can use xfce, gnome is just so much better.

Please expand on this statement.

 No.1650

>>1649
IDK what he means by that either. Your setup looks nice and clean. Moved on from Mint I see :^)

 No.1651

>>1649
It's just a lot more intuitive, I think a good comparison is using page down rather than the scroll bar.

 No.1652

>>1651
Do you have any examples? I'm assuming your comparison was a metaphor, since page down/up is how you also navigate xfce.

 No.1653

File: 1525541550987.jpg (79.58 KB, 800x599, absolute_li….jpg)

This isn't my desktop, but it totally looks like something that Unity would be into.

https://www.linux.com/learn/intro-to-linux/2018/5/absolute-linux-offers-old-school-charm-thanks-slackware

 No.1654

>>1648
GNOME is the shittiest DE ever.
>no minimize/maximize by default
>have to install an extra tool just to get back that most basic feature
>have to install browser extension just to get things that give back basic functionality (like a menu that doesn't suck)
>it all breaks next time GNOME updates
>GUI package manager that doesn't find half the shit that just running the terminal command does
>now featuring more bloat than fucking KDE
>no right-click > new file in the file manager
>GNOME apps are non-conforming, so if you run i.e. gedit in a tiling wm it will still have the GIANT ugly title bar
>all this while relying on systemdick
GNOME is trash.

 No.1655

>>1654
wew.

I haven't used GNOME in a long time, and didn't know it had gotten that bad. I check on screenshots every one in a while, and it looks like it's aimed at being a touch-screen replacement.

 No.1656

File: 1525553832900.png (2.3 KB, 640x480, rio.png)


 No.1657

>>1653
You have an android phone and google linux frequently, i assume, because this was recommended to me via jewgle this morning. Thanks, though, I never bothered to click it.

 No.1658

>>1657
>using google

You got the wrong guy mate. It's an article posted yesterday to linux.com

That's how I found it.

 No.1659

>>1657
>he uses google and likes GNOME
unity, you never cease to amaze me.

 No.1660

>>1655

If you buy into gnomes workflow you're fine. The problem is if you want to break away from what they want you too do. Then things get hairy.

I personally love the way there desktops work, and the way they handle there activity view is (in my opinion) an improvement over macOS's expose.

But I'm not a typical user. I live in a terminal and my IDE (intellij).

 No.1661

File: 1525704253909.jpg (132.26 KB, 1366x768, screenshot.jpg)

hi buddies
lxqt is nice on my battery

 No.1664

>>1661
Is lxqt more stable now? Last I tried it, it felt like it was put together with a bit of duct tape. it was also just as resource intensive as xfce, which kind of defeats the purpose.

 No.1665

>>1664
I'm assuming you are using "resource intensive" very loosely here

 No.1666

File: 1526178200810.png (3.84 MB, 2560x1440, Screenshot_….png)

Changed up the start menu icon.

 No.1667

>>1665
yes. What I mean is, LXDE was always more lightweight than XFCE, which made up for its comparative lack of features. LXQT used the same amount of resources as XFCE, which doesn't really give it much of a place. At least, that was the case when I tried it. It may have changed.

 No.1668

File: 1526218128846.png (284.39 KB, 1366x768, Screenshot-….png)

it's pretty basic looking.

 No.1669

File: 1526430506002.jpg (319.84 KB, 1920x1200, cyberpunkgn….jpg)

>>1667

LXQT is for people who want a qt version of XFCE. It's a bit more configurable than LXDE and some people (somehow) prefer qt over gtk

also reminder that the gnu is the best animal.

 No.1670

>>1669
>some people (somehow) prefer qt over gtk
At this point in development, I actually prefer QT over GTK because GTK is slowly becoming synonymous with the GNOME project. It's less becoming a wildly customize-able and universal toolkit and more becoming a toolkit for GNOME to use that also happens to work in other DEs, and it's only going to get worse. QT has it's flaws, but at least it's goal is still to be a universal toolkit rather than just being for KDE or something.

 No.1671

>>1670

I almost strictly relate QT to KDE.

 No.1672

>>1670
I actually agree with this. I think that GTK is becoming more and more of a "GNOME" thing, and that's not a very good thing, considering how most of us would rate GNOME (which is to say, a dumpster fire/10). I welcome projects like LXQT because of it. QT has its problems, but at least it isn't brought to you by the same people who thought that getting rid of minimize and maximize buttons was a good idea.

 No.1673

>>1672
Also I'll add that there's some really good QT applications that make more qt based desktops appealing. kdenlive and clementine for starters. Qbittorrent is great. Pcmanfm has a qt port now, and Falkon looks like it might develop into a decent browser, if it gets support for a umatrix-like addon. Also konversation makes for a surprisingly /comfy/ irc experience.

 No.1676

Don't really feel like posting my desktop but i have a question. Why would anyone have a desktop background? Seems like it would only be distracting. I haven't used one in 2 years and i still struggle to see a point.

 No.1677

>>1676
Mine rotates between space, natural environments, and sexy ladies.

I don't see it 90% of the time because I have windows covering most of the desktop at any given time. The only time I really see the background images is when I first sit down, and when I close all the windows for the night.

Though when I am writing code, or managing networks, I see it a lot more. If you do a lot of stuff through a terminal or command line, a background is nice decoration.

 No.1678

>>1676
Because i like looking at pretty things.
Why does your house have paint?

 No.1679

File: 1527119183105.png (1.63 MB, 1920x1080, antergos.png)

Speaking of Qt, KDE has gotten… good.

 No.1680

File: 1527636301539.png (1.47 MB, 1920x1080, neofetch-20….png)

>>1666
>>1668
Jumping on the MX hype train. Great distro. tfw didn't even have to provide my own background.

 No.1683

File: 1527897506202.png (1.88 MB, 1366x768, Untitled.png)

my desktop rotates between about 20 images, but here's the screencap of what it was about 30 secs ago

 No.1684

>>1683
>Windows
>Cortana enabled
>Chrome
>Discord
>Skype
>uTorrent
>Google Docs and Sheets
Is this bait?

 No.1685

>>1684
Looks like a normie desktop. Bet that anon gets laid.

 No.1686

>>1683
That said anon i would recommend making a folder and putting all the shortcuts you never use in there, like the intel and 7 zip and other stuff.

 No.1687

>>1684
It's gotta be. There's no way someone is so oblivious they use all of the worst options.

 No.1695

File: 1529276886386.png (2.2 MB, 1920x1080, openbox.png)

>>1680
Same distro, now with comfy openbox setup.

 No.1696

>>1695

Is it still a pain in the ass to set-up openbox? Do you still have to create a launcher for every program you install?

 No.1697

>>1696
Technically yes, but there's a couple of very easy ways to work around that. The first is to just use a keyboard launcher like dmenu. I use rofi personally, invoked with Super+Space, and have it configured to be able to launch programs and switch to open windows. The other option, which I've also done, is to use a little program called menumaker that will automatically configure your menu for you. It's not in a lot of repos, but it's very easy to find and install. I'd recommend doing both, as I did, just for the sake of convenience.

As far as general config stuff, It's not the easiest to setup (I actually think fluxbox is a bit more simple iirc), but it's not bad. Plus there's utilities like obconf and obmenu that make things easier. And remember that openbox uses a seperate autostart file rather than placing it at the bottom of the config or something.

 No.1723

File: 1531859452063.png (2.22 MB, 1920x1080, i3mx.png)

>>1695
Added i3 for the autism trifecta: DM, stacking WM, and tiling WM. Now I can tickle my tism no matter what I'm in the mood for! Also added a bit of transparency and changed the terminal font to something from the Computer Modern (i.e. comfy) family.

 No.1768

File: 1533698623725.png (978.26 KB, 1366x768, firstdeskto….png)

>>1086
This is my new friend I've got for university.

He's quite comfy.

 No.1771

>>1768
That's great, but can it run Microsoft Office or Photoshop?

Uni is going to require them.

 No.1772

>>1771
Simply untrue. I've never been asked to open Photoshop, that definitely depends on major. As far as Microsoft Office goes, I've had to write a lot of papers and make some presentations and such. There was nothing LibreOffice could not handle being thrown at it. There's also LaTeX, which is what I use to write all of my more formal papers and looks a lot BETTER than anything Microsoft Office can put out.

 No.1773

>>1771
Unless you're going to your university for graphic design, you're not going to need Photoshop, and I cannot remember an instance where I couldn't use LibreOffice or Google Docs for the entirety of my uni life.

>>1772
LaTeX is life

 No.1774

>>1771
If he was going to uni for gd or anything with cad he wouldnt have gotten a chromebook
The most important thing you need for college is google docs and slides anyway. Most big projects are team projects.

 No.1776

>>1771
No they aren't? Why would polisci require photoshop?

Also Libreoffice is 100% word compatible.

 No.1777

File: 1533848597389.png (887.09 KB, 1366x768, 2018-08-09-….png)

>>1768
here's my i3 desktop as well. fuck i love gallium.

 No.1778

File: 1533852097708.jpg (306.07 KB, 1920x1080, desktap2.jpg)


 No.1779

File: 1533852166574.jpg (73.18 KB, 666x748, zlatan.jpg)

>>1777

nice trips

 No.1780

>>1778
fucking stroodcar

 No.1781

File: 1533931876906.png (55.36 KB, 1366x768, 2018-08-10-….png)

>>1777
Le update

 No.1807

File: 1537673566759.png (2.25 MB, 1920x1080, sep18.png)

>>1623
This wallpaper is still excellent.



[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ an / co / v / t ] [ e / r / sp ] [ p / s ] [ All / Recent / RSS ] [ FAQ / IRC / Rules / Legal / News ] [ Twitter ] [ Mod ]